and peripheral compared with central stimulation. In glaucoma research it is not known whether, for testing flicker responses in a certain retinal area, a careful control of the variables discussed above is necessary in order to obtain an optimal discrimination between normals and patients. Weather forecast for Nürnberg, friseur Contrast, Nuremberg updated. A comparison of TCS between different locations within the visual field has been made in a few previous studies using flickering light spots. 11 Subsequent detailed investigations showed that TCS and FFF strongly depended on the size, retinal location, and luminance of the stimulus. Temporal contrast sensitivity full field flicker glaucoma ocular hypertension.org/10.1136/bjo.83.2.199, statistics from. Patients and methods Focal liver lesions in 100 high-risk patients were assessed using both ceus algorithms (esculap and ceus-LI-radsv.2016) for a direct comparison. A specificity of 96 was chosen, as it includes two standard deviations from the mean value. The full field bowl was located in a darkened, isolated room.
Nürnberg klinikum süd besuchszeiten
Hartz 4 miete 3 personen nürnberg
Triathlon nürnberger land
No significant differences were found between conditions (unpaired t test,.02). The stimuli used by current methods of flicker perimetry neglect the peculiarities of different retinal areas and their consideration would require much technical examination and a great deal of cooperation from the patient, making such a test impractical for screening purposes. In all, 232 subjects were tested who satisfied the following criteria: refractive errors less than 9 dioptres (myopic or hyperopic best refracted visual acuity better than 20/30, no previous cataract surgery, clear optic media, open anterior chamber angle, no systemic illnesses influencing the eye such. It was not significant (p.01) in the normals, the OHTs, or the perimetric glaucomas, but in preperimetric glaucoma group it was (p.01). All subjects underwent a full ophthalmological examination (see below confirming a normal eye or excluding any ophthalmological diseases other than glaucoma. Abstract, aIMS, to evaluate temporal contrast sensitivity with full field, peripheral, and central stimulation and to determine the most sensitive corresponding retinal area for glaucoma damage. The contrast of the whole field flickering stimulus was increased progressively in fixed steps.1 until it was detected by the subject. Both tests allowed a good separation of patients from normals. Thus, one may assume that all gericht koblenz öffentliche verhandlungstermine tests were carried out with comparable levels of retinal illumination under all conditions and in all subjects.